DarCode is booking new AI engineering engagements for Q4

Service / AI Engineering

AI Systems Built to Survive Real Traffic

Most AI projects die between the demo and production. We build the part that survives: evaluation, retrieval, guardrails, and the infrastructure underneath.

Every engagement
Eval-first
Model strategy
Open + closed
You own it
Full source
Team makeup
Senior only

What is included

Inside AI Engineering

The concrete pieces of work an engagement covers.

Model Selection

We pick the model against your benchmark and your unit economics, not against a leaderboard.

Strategy001

Fine-Tuning

Full fine-tunes, LoRA adapters, and preference tuning when the domain shift genuinely justifies it.

Training002

Evaluation Harness

Offline suites, online scoring, and drift alarms wired into CI so regressions never reach users.

Quality003

Retrieval

Hybrid search, reranking, and chunking strategies tuned against your actual corpus.

Grounding004

Agent Runtimes

Tool-use, planning, and recovery loops with approval gates on anything that writes.

Autonomy005

Guardrails

Policy enforcement, prompt-injection defence, and red-teaming as a standing practice.

Safety006

Unique approach

Why Teams Bring Us In

Not all AI delivery is the same. The difference shows up the week after launch.

With DarCode

  • Benchmark defined before any code is written
  • Retrieval tuned against your real corpus
  • Inference cost modelled before build
  • Regression gates in CI on every change
  • Full source and infrastructure handed over
  • Senior engineers from scoping to ship

Typical alternative

  • Success measured by a demo that went well
  • Default chunking, default embeddings, hope
  • Cost discovered on the first invoice
  • Manual spot-checks when something feels off
  • Locked to a platform or an agency retainer
  • Sold by principals, built by juniors

How it runs

From Kickoff To Handover

The same sequence every time, compressed or extended to fit the engagement.

  1. 01

    Scope

    We define the benchmark and the failure modes that actually matter to you.

  2. 02

    Baseline

    Cheapest viable approach first, measured, so we know what complexity buys.

  3. 03

    Build

    Retrieval, prompts, tools, and guardrails developed against the eval suite.

  4. 04

    Harden

    Load, cost, and adversarial testing before anyone outside the team sees it.

  5. 05

    Handover

    Source, infrastructure-as-code, runbooks, and a working CI pipeline.

Tooling

What We Reach For

Defaults, not dogma. The stack follows the problem.

  • Anthropic
  • OpenAI
  • Gemini
  • Mistral
  • Hugging Face
  • PyTorch
  • LangChain
  • Qdrant

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions we get asked about ai engineering.

Not always. If you have a corpus we tune against it. If you do not, we start with a public or synthetic baseline and design the data collection alongside the build.

Whichever wins the eval at an acceptable cost. In practice that means frontier models where reasoning depth matters, and open-weights models where inference cost, latency, or data residency dominate.

A benchmark we agree on before the build starts, scored the same way every run, with the failure modes you care about weighted explicitly.

You own everything. We offer a support window and can stay on retainer, but nothing in the build requires our continued involvement.

Yes. A large share of our work is embedding with an in-house team, setting the engineering standard, and handing the system over.

Get started

Let's Build It, Together

Tell us what you are trying to ship. We will tell you the three shortest paths to it, and which one we would actually take.